Xxgwise
PremiumEntrar
Noticias

EEOC Sues New York Times Over Alleged Reverse Discrimination in Promotion Case

InternacionalNacionalYorkAnderlechtDenderPortugalNemanRB LeipzigSheriff Tiraspol

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has filed a lawsuit against The New York Times, alleging the newspaper discriminated against a white male editor by denying him a promotion in favor of a less qualified woman to meet diversity targets.

In a significant legal challenge to corporate diversity initiatives, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has launched a lawsuit against The New York Times. The federal agency alleges the newspaper engaged in discrimination against a white male employee by passing him over for a promotion in 2025.

The case centers on the deputy real estate editor position. According to the EEOC's complaint, filed on behalf of a long-serving editor at the paper, the man was denied the role despite his qualifications. The agency claims the newspaper instead selected a woman who was less qualified for the job, with the decision allegedly driven by the company's public diversity goals.

The lawsuit is grounded in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employment discrimination based on race, sex, national origin, or religion. EEOC President Andrea Lucas stated that the action underscores a fundamental principle. "There is no such thing as 'reverse discrimination.' All discrimination based on race or sex is illegal," she said, emphasizing that no institution is above the law.

Lucas, known as an ally of the Trump administration's stance against corporate diversity programs, has previously encouraged white men to report instances of discrimination they believe they have faced. The EEOC's complaint points to The New York Times' own public commitments, including a 2021 plan to increase the number of Black and Latino leaders by 50% by 2025. The agency notes this target was reportedly met by 2022, yet the programs continued.

The New York Times has mounted a vigorous defense against the allegations. A spokesperson for the newspaper, Danielle Rhoades Ha, dismissed the lawsuit as "politically motivated." She asserted that the EEOC ignored relevant facts to support a predetermined narrative. "We hired the most qualified candidate, and she is an excellent editor," Ha stated, denying that race or gender played any role in the promotion decision.

The complaint provides details about the individuals involved. The male editor has worked at The New York Times since 2014, primarily in the international desk, and possessed experience relevant to real estate coverage. In contrast, the EEOC alleges the woman selected for the deputy editor role lacked experience in that specific field, suggesting she fit the demographic characteristics the newspaper was seeking to amplify in its leadership ranks.

This lawsuit is part of a broader pattern of enforcement by the EEOC under its current leadership. The agency is also investigating other major corporations, including Nike, over similar allegations of racial discrimination against white employees. Critics of the EEOC's actions argue that such lawsuits unfairly target programs designed to address historical inequalities in the American workforce.

Based on reporting from g1.